harassment (archived by Veli)

[Chuck]

maths pls quit the spamming in normal topics jeezzz, i see recently more spam posts of you outside spam section. Consider this is as a warnign since no supporter is saying something to you.

[Nirv]

There is not really a harassment by sky. But kenny and andre talk crap about the demo team and "how bad they are" and mostly about samael and nirv.

Also kenny insult nirv.

http://s1.directupload.net/images/140802/5u36pgpc.jpg

and sky plaese dont provoke him

I don't feel offended with that lol.

Anyhow it's easier to talk in the back and leave the clan every 2 weeks when something isn't going right. (Whatever the reason is, tbh I personnaly don't really care about it.)

Sounds funny to see them blaming the demo team when they clearly aren't experienced/skilled enough to bust one single cheater.
But hey it's easier to blame others than actually doing the job itself and doing something useful.

PS : I apologies if i didn't help his new "friend" to get unbanned from ND though. Once again I would have checked everything and it would have been different if she behaved normally ... :-)
She can only blame herself for that.

[Storch]

Well it's not really new to hear such things of Kenny and of course upset ex-members like Andre jump on board very quick and easy. They just like to generalize things and claim that the demo team always fails, even though there was just this 1 incident which was questionable.

Anyway, it's good that Sky at least shows some remorse, I don't think he meant it too serious. Claiming that Yolo wants everyone banned who owns him is just ridiculous. There are a lot of cheaters in ND recently and he just seems to have a good nose for them, even if he is wrong sometimes.

But this whole xicii case seems to have awoken sleeping devils in some upset (ex)members and gave them fresh fuel trying to burn down TWC and especially the demo team. Chris is another of those candidates. We should not take it / them too seriously

[Mimus]

Since Sky apologized and Yolo seems to accept it (at least I do not see any negative posts concerning that), would you agree to close that topic?

Getting into a discussion about the demoteam is useless. The ones of you who remember the times we did not have the demoteam might know that we had a high rate of bans of which, i bet, a higher percentage was wrong than it is the case today.
Ofc it might seem like demoteam "fails" since we now can actively take a look at the reasons and the proof behind a ban - and sometimes there is no consense, or the opinions change after a second investigation. But that does not mean that before we had the demoteam things were any better - the reverse is true.