![]() |
|
Heavy SK Rule (archived by Antho) - Printable Version +- -TWC| Forum (https://board.twcclan.org) +-- Forum: Archive (https://board.twcclan.org/forum-50.html) +--- Forum: Archive (https://board.twcclan.org/forum-51.html) +--- Thread: Heavy SK Rule (archived by Antho) (/thread-3589.html) |
RE: Heavy SK Rule - Sky - 27-11-2013 this thread is going out of subject i think, however i would disagree with this "member of all servers" thing, just because it would cause a lot of trouble for recruitment, choosing high admins, seeing who's active and who's not, dealing with rulebreaks etc etc + our actual system isn't that bad, why would we change? RE: Heavy SK Rule - YesMan - 27-11-2013 (27-11-2013, 07:52 PM)Sky Wrote: however i would disagree with this "member of all servers" thing, just because it would cause a lot of trouble for recruitment, choosing high admins, Yeah. From a management point of view it's a disadvantageous. Why do you think an administrative divisions exist in countries? You've got an areas, a municipalities, a parishes, a provinces, a regions, a states, etc. It's easier to menage if your zone is smaller. Always. (27-11-2013, 07:52 PM)Sky Wrote: + our actual system isn't that bad, why would we change? Don't say it so fast. It just has been implemented. Let's wait a few days. (but yeah, it seems to be good). btw. Moderator could transfer this couple of posts afield to the new thread. RE: Heavy SK Rule - djuki - 28-11-2013 b.o.t.? (back on topic) |